Gotcha, yeah I can appreciate insisting on higher evidentiary standards

Why omit “using” from your summary at the end there? They wrote a whole article about how they love using AI and think anyone who doesn’t is comparatively unproductive. In fact they have over a dozen articles about adjacent AI topics. It’s not really a weak connection at all it’s literally just them saying they do the thing lol

Regardless, the blog itself actually has an AI disclosure: “I use AI heavily on this blog”. Followed by another article about how it is used “correctly” in this case. If you’re just in the mood to argue or whatever I guess we can debate the specific definitions and nuances between literally just copying a whole article from AI output (which they emphatically say they do not do) vs passing your writing through AI to assist you throughout the process

Well, one of the first linked articles is them talking about how much they love using it and how fun it is and how everyone should be using it

I get what you’re saying but not every person needs to be working on the same cause. Even if we did that, America would be pretty far down the list compared to other places at the moment

But thankfully we do have tons of projects going that are run by people who care a lot about that particular thing and feel engaged in it. Sometimes that’s forest conservation, sometimes that’s renewable energy, sometimes that’s human welfare, this time it’s shrimp welfare. And who knows, maybe this concept with the shrimp will give someone pause and actually motivate them to do some of their own unique good for the world

Could I pay them to keep it undelivered?

You wouldn’t get it