Which? argues that a customer who would have theoretically paid £1.99 for the service but was not able to do so because the actual £2.99 price was unaffordable suffered a £1 loss, even though the customer paid nothing.

Maybe you have to be a lawyer to understand this, because to me it sounds like complete nonsense.

Kind of funny to see how much longer the original German is to express the same dialogue, even accounting for the difference in font size.

For extra context: szünet is Hungarian for intermission