Oh I’m doing this thing called paraphrasing, to illustrate how what you’re saying sounds to people who are not you and may not think the same way as you do.

Had I intended to actually quote you, I would have used > actual quote formatting.

Do you agree or disagree that shaming of shorter men is a socially acceptable form of bigotry?

Can you see how you proposing an individualistic solution to that, where you likely would propose a social solution to other social problems… is something of a double standard?

(As an example, men openly shaming/insulting overweight women)

Finally: My paraphrasing of what you said is in fact accurate. You suggested that the solution to this problem is for men to just be confident in knowing that bigots are bad people.

Cool, but that doesn’t stop the bigotry.

Maybe you could think about what I say, then.

I mean… yeah.

IMO, those are the kind of people who should be on a list… not trans people who would like to be able to use a public bathroom.

But, we live in a world where apparently 40% of cops with access to camera networks that track liscense plate movement, use that to stalk their exes.

Yeah, my only quibble would be that for the violators, well, they do get off on power tripping, being able to fuck with other people in ways that they cannot prevent or stymie.

Its basically the rapist/groomer type of mindset.

So it does end up being sexual, but basically via extra steps.

But yes… its fucked up either way, also fucked up as a potential business model.

POV porn exists, you could just actually work out an agreement with a strip club to basically rent it out to do a shoot one day, if you wanted to end up with pretty much the same kind of video, except everyone involved actually signed up for it.

I don’t know if you’ve been to a American strip club.

Rules often tend to be more like ‘guidelines’, that don’t actually exist as long as you appear to be following them, appear to understand the concept of plausible deniability, and/or are throwing around enough money to make people look the other way.

Pay the cover, play it cool, don’t ask stupid questions, don’t get caught?

I can absolutely see this happening.

Grok, undress her, render this entire scene as if she had no clothes… or was only wearing cellophane, whatever.

… Its still wild to me that people will do something like that, when you can literally just go to a strip club and look, or look at the vast, uncountable amount of erotica or porn that people freely post of themselves.

… Oh dear god.

Somebody is going to wear these things into a strip club and sell it like a fucking virtu in cyberpunk 77.

Damn you for making the intro theme play in my head.

You can record a video of someone shopping, and then feed it to a visual AI.

Blamo presto, now they’re a shoplifter, or at least everyone on social media thinks they are.

The possibilities are endless.

Because they are immensely cheap.

Ah ok, so it is approximately the same as ‘subbing in’, temporarily doing the work that a more established worker usually does.

I think it means like uh… substitutes in, as a temp worker.

Like how a susbstitute teacher ‘subs in’ for the normal teacher, Jucika is a trainee who got their first chance, due to someone else being on sick leave or what not.

Oh in that case:

I love seahorse emojis, every time someone shows me a seahorse emoji I just help can’t myself from telling them where I live so that I can figure out how to drive over to them and give them a hug!

I hear you, and my answer is the same strategy that is currently defeating Trump in Iran:

Rope a Dope.

Conserve your energy, maintain your stamina, conceal your strength, keep him moving.

Only take a chance at a strike you know will hit, then flutter away.

Couple rounds of that, he’s having a heart attack, you win.

He notoriously has horrendous posture.

That means his core will tire out rapidly if you keep him him on his toes.

I don’t know if this particular person is satire or not

It is not.

This person is cognitive dissonance personified, they’re not capable of mental consistency, they are a delusional cult member, their brain works in such a way that it pretzels to find any possible reason to justify and glorify the cult leader.

If you haven’t personally lost friends and family members to the MAGA cult, please trust me, I am being completely serious.

Hah!

Oh, he will have them after I get a shot at him.

EDIT:

If Kash Patel is reading this, ‘get a shot at him’ is a colloquial phrase that indicates a chance to engage another in hand to hand combat, contextually as a hypothetical, potentially involving hyperbole.

I know it’s hard to read things straight after a bender, been there buddy.

Well technically, you could have your legs shattered, and then stretched out, casted up.

You know, just a simple lifestyle change, nothing major, no chance that could horrendously backfire.

Like, uh, its looksmaxxing for your… legs… or something.

‘There is a form of socially acceptable discrimination against a subset of people based around a fundamental intrinsic element of those people that they are totally incapable of changing.’

‘Chin up, be strong, don’t let the bastards get you down!’

Oh so … not a situation where we maybe need or could benefit from a serious society-wide discussion of this problem, the solution to this form of bigotry is uh… its a personal responsibility.

Got it.

… How about just:

WE WILL, WE WILL, ROCK YOU

You want fightin’ words?

Those are fightin’ words.

I prefer to back up my classifications with data.

No, this is real.

Roughly 1/4 to 1/3 of this country is in a goofy as fuck, anti-reality, violent and dangerous death cult, called MAGA.

You know how like in Japan or SK, large wealthy cults have an outsized impact on politics, scandals when it turns out a PM or whoever got a bunch of money from one?

We elected our cult leader president.

Thats… thats roughly the framing you need, for this to maybe actually make sense in your brain, as anything other than the worlds grandest reality TV show.

Yougov recently did a poll.

https://yougov.com/en-us/articles/54707-how-many-americans-think-they-could-beat-donald-trump-in-a-fight

On average, 66% of Americans think they could win a fight, an actual fist fight, with Donald Trump.

10% thought they’d lose, 24% unsure.

Now break it down by party.

Democrats:

75% would win, 5% would lose, 20% unsure.

Republicans:

39% would win, 33% would lose, 28% unsure.

…

So thats’s 25% of Dems don’t think they’re certain to win, vs 61% of Reps don’t think they’re certain to win…

… a fight against an obese and literally demented 79 year old with bone spurs, who wears diapers, and is often seen nodding off during meetings.

You really can only explain something like this by framing the hardcore MAGA folks as delusional, mentally impaired cult members.

They have Trump Derangement Syndrome, but its the opposite of what they think it is… its North Korea levels of Dear Leader god-king worship.