• DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    4 days ago

    People act as if it was a bug and not a feature. This was intended. After people sufficiently make fun of the current solution that everyone knows how easily it is broken, the next step is requiring both ID and face scan and comparing photo on ID with face scan. Congrats, privacy is removed completely. Every poster is now tied with real life identity.

  • GreenBeanMachine@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 days ago

    “Well, now that they found ways to bypass the checks, we need to introduce even more checks. Let’s make them spit into a device every time they turn on a PC, then check their age based on their genetic markers.” - Politicians

  • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 days ago

    Yeah, because it isn’t about that. They don’t give a fuck about kids seeing porn. Even when there are age checks, there will be plenty of free porn.

    It’s all about being able to connect an online post with the author.

    • deczzz@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Extremely stupid idea for a law but I don’t think the people who are for this did it to sneak in surveillance. I think they are simply too stupid to understand digital tech and internet and how these laws won’t work to fix the problems they are trying to solve - namely that a lot of young do too much of the bad internet. The surveillance thing is just a bonus

    • pwxd@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 days ago

      They’re doing this age verification on purpose just to spy on adults lol

    • U7826391786239@piefed.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      it’s not just the author, but the author’s address, friends, family, employer, coworkers, shopping list, where they go and what they do in their spare time, what kind of health issues they have, who they’re having affairs with–pretty much everything, wrapped up in a bow by AI, ready to be spreadsheeted/cross-referenced across all those data points.

      what fascists do

    • Watermark710@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 days ago

      When I was little, my mom used to send me to the store with a note that said to sell me cigarettes, and that they were for her. When I started smoking, I used to reuse the notes to get my own smokes. I got my first fake ID at 13 so I could buy beer.

      • i078@europe.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        When I was 13 I could just buy beer, the trick was to make it look like you are helping your parents with groceries. So also pickup stuff like a carton of eggs, potatoes and milk. I never had any issue, but it was a different time and in Europe

  • shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    I guess now we must ban pens and markers because children might draw fake mustaches and bypass age verification.

    So long humble pen. We will miss you.

    • Noja@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      Age checks are common and seen as easy to complete. About half of children (53%) say they have recently been asked to verify their age, most often when setting up new accounts. According to children, the following methods were described as easy: uploading a government ID document (88%), facial age estimation (89%) and using a third-party app (88%).

      Wow, they are really teaching children to upload their government ID to random internet websites who ask for it. Identity theft heaven.

    • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      Not for the people pushing for this Orwellian shit.

      Most people will just comply, and “most people” is who they want to spy on and control.

  • melsaskca@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    We should get all of our advice from little kids. They have not yet been bound by knowing what is or isn’t possible. The meek shall inherit the earth.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      We should get all of our advice from little kids.

      These articles tend to lean on click-baity “One Neat Trick” headlines, while disguising the more practical hit-or-miss reality of facial recognition software. Sometimes you can outsmart the computer. Sometimes it just fouls the system and fails out. Sometimes the system works exactly as intended.

      Little kids experiment around the edges of a system until they get bored or frustrated. In the aggregate, they can be very clever just through the number of permutations they try. Individually, your 12-year-old isn’t going to Hack The Internet reliably.

  • Yggstyle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    As someone who spent my formative days figuring out how to bypass early digital locks my school was putting in place to “protect us” … The system loses this game. Every time. You are taking kids with nothing but time, no apparent drawbacks, and everything to gain… And placing them against “good enough” implemented by people who could give two shits about it.

    This will continue to lose until they twist the knobs too tight and hit false positive central… And oops now the populace hates it. Control for thee is fine until its for me.

    Tale as old as technology itself.

    • thermal_shock@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      Mine was simple, but great. IE was hidden/removed in our typing class, maybe 5th grade. I guessed you could type a www.domain.tld in Word and when you pressed space, got a clickable URL that was still tied to IE. I knew about the URL, but learned it would still open with IE hidden. 🤣🤣

  • IninewCrow@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 days ago

    How about instead of trying every complicated stupid way to regulate users and especially children … you regulate and control companies and corporations instead.

    • SynonymousStoat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 days ago

      Or, ya know, make parents take responsibility for their own children and monitor what they are doing online. If you don’t want your kids seeing or participating in things online then don’t give them unfettered access to smart phones and computers!

      • Zagorath@quokk.au
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 days ago

        I agree, letting parents do their job of parenting is the best way to deal with this. But the problem is that that’s very difficult, and they currently lack adequate tools.

        The best method would be to make sure operating systems support parental controls that parents can set, and require websites to respect those settings (and browsers to support an API passthrough of the OS setting). That way there’s no need to do any age verification that sends sensitive data like ID or faces to third-parties with sketchy privacy policies.

        Unfortunately, when moves were actually taken to implement this kind of solution, reactionaries pushed back and made sure it didn’t happen.

          • Zagorath@quokk.au
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 days ago

            Some guy put a PR in to the Linux kernal and to systemd, IIRC. The community pushback was huge, despite it literally just being a field users could fill in themselves if they wanted.

            I’m not sure if he ended up succeeding. IIRC last time I checked it was in systemd but not Linux, but that could have changed and I could be misremembering.

            • azuth@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 days ago

              I think it was accepted in systemd. There was no commit in the kernel because such things are really don’t belong in the kernel.

              But the law it was a response too is horrible. If any ‘app’, regardless of it including any unsafe content (or content at all really) must ask for this information from the OS. Otherwise the developer and/or controller (which can be whoever installed the app) is liable for thousands of dollars.

              This only makes sense if you think the only ‘apps’ that exist are ones written by FAANG.

      • knatschus@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 days ago

        Combine both and demand parental controls for devices and services. The isp is paid for by an adult that’s the only age check websites should need. Parents should have easily accessible tools to mark a os or browser as used by a minor.

      • vortic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 days ago

        I kind fo agree and kind of don’t. I agree in that parents should take accountability for their children. That said, social media has been shown to be addictive and kids are frequently ahead of their parents technologically. One thing that could help is an education campaign that teaches parents how to effectively monitor their kid’s online activity. Parents need some help figuring out what tools to use and how to use them I think.

        • backalleycoyote@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          Good point. Kids know too much and get addicted too early. Adult know too little and can’t tell the difference between lies and reality. Everybody consumes way too much porn. That’s it, everybody put their phones in the garbage. No more Internet, everyone gets a landline, rotary dial, call on the other end does’t disconnect if you don’t hang yours up.

          • mynameisbob@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            If they had better things to do they wouldn’t be jerkin it. It is not addictive. It is a modern capitalist society issue where the people that create the solution are the ones causing the problem. It is a enviromental issue.

            • backalleycoyote@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              I’m gonna stop you right there because you’re flirting dangerously close to Victorian prudishness with a modern spin. There is absolutely nothing new about non-reproductive sexual behavior and the practice is not limited to humans. We’ve found sexually explicit images in cave paintings, Mesopotamia, a lot in Greece & Rome (including homoerotica), and the Kama Sutra is about 2000yrs old. Humans, including adolescents, have been jerkin’ it for centuries before the invisible hand came along.

              What has occurred is that the accessibility, volume, and content of pornography has expanded and changed. Where people might have previously spanked it and finished in a few minutes then gone on with their day, now they can delay gratification and spend hours gooning to a never ending supply of whatever form of visual stimulus they want, including content that was never even intended or attempted to be pornographic. The pornography itself is not addictive, the physiological and mental stimulation is. For some, there’s a need to explore and indulge riskier sexual behaviors and fetishes to achieve the rush they got previously. I was pretty excited when I saw my first nudie mag at 8, by the time I was 16 it wasn’t as exciting because by then internet porn had become accessible. But, had nudie mags remained my only option for such content, I would have continued to masturbate to nudie mags.

              There’s also nothing inherently wrong with the idea of pornography, voyuerism, group play, sex toys, etc so long as all parties involved consent to the activity they’re engaging in. Humans like sex, they like masturbation, they like watching others perform it. Again, consent of all parties involved is the key factor. Truly understanding how to give and respect consent in what can be a high consequence interaction is why we set hard lines about age of consent and prohibit (or attempt to) minors from such activities, but also know that many are exploring and engaging in such behavior privately or with peers regardless. There’s a healthy, normal aspect to that because it’s human nature, and then there’s the dangerous side because porn of every sort lacks a lesson in consent, is often unrealistic/fantastical/deviant, and often treats the passive partner as an object for the pleasure of the active partner (typically women, but trans, “twink”, animals, and children are also depicted as such).

              This is the danger of porn to malleable minds who are responding to the biology of sex drive but do not yet have the confidence/skill/capacity to build healthy relationships where they can build intimacy and eventually engage in sex with a willing, consenting partner. Some end up forgoing the effort to find a partner entirely and meet their need with porn, which is a sad and unhealthy avenue. Other take the lessons of objectification and violate the boundaries of other. And the worst make their most deviant, dangerous, and hurtful fantasies reality. Some would behave like that without having been exposed to porn, but I would argue that porn is having a strong influence on the spread and normalization of truly deviant fetishes, like beast/child/gore/rape.

              The commodification of sex is older than capitalism, it was being bartered and traded since… since forever. What capitalism has done is make a normal human behavior a profitable vice. Adults embracing their sexuality, recording it, selling it for other adults to view is not problematic so long as everyone who made it consented to the acts recorded and consents to the recording being put out for consumption by strangers. The internet has created a platform where it’s impossible to tell if those criteria were met before the material became permanently available and globally distributed, as well is a bastion of anonymity that can be accessed by anyone of any age. You can try and put up guardrails but humans are just going to figure out a workaround if they are inclined to do so. Pandora’s box has been opened, and even if there is no money to be made people are going to view, share, and trade porn. If you shut the internet down people would revert to whatever media forms were available to do the same. Even if you magically erased all porn, people, including adolescents, would still masturbate. What might diminish is the frequency and amount of time they spend doing so as well as the cultivation of deviant fetishes and objectifying partners.

              The people trying to create a “solution” aren’t doing so because they see that some forms of porn production and consumption is problematic, they see human sexuality as problematic. They’re not trying to steer how porn is produced and consumed into a healthy manner, they treat sexuality outside of their concept of divine purpose as deviant. Plus it’s a “rules for thee not me” attitude, especially when the people pushing it support one of the world’s most infamous and abusive deviants. The human need for sexual stimulation/release is like the human need to eat and drink. Capitalism didn’t invent it, it just exploits necessity.

              • mynameisbob@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 day ago
                1. I’m gonna stop you right there because you’re flirting dangerously close to Victorian prudishness with a modern spin. There is absolutely nothing new about non-reproductive sexual behavior and the practice is not limited to humans. We’ve found sexually explicit images in cave paintings, Mesopotamia, a lot in Greece & Rome (including homoerotica), and the Kama Sutra is about 2000yrs old. Humans, including adolescents, have been jerkin’ it for centuries before the invisible hand came along.

                My response: OK

                1. What has occurred is that the accessibility, volume, and content of pornography has expanded and changed. Where people might have previously spanked it and finished in a few minutes then gone on with their day, now they can delay gratification and spend hours gooning to a never ending supply of whatever form of visual stimulus they want, including content that was never even intended or attempted to be pornographic. The pornography itself is not addictive, the physiological and mental stimulation is. For some, there’s a need to explore and indulge riskier sexual behaviors and fetishes to achieve the rush they got previously. I was pretty excited when I saw my first nudie mag at 8, by the time I was 16 it wasn’t as exciting because by then internet porn had become accessible. But, had nudie mags remained my only option for such content, I would have continued to masturbate to nudie mags.

                My response:

                Like I said, if they had better things to do, they wouldn’t be jerking it all day. I’m living example of that. I have many hobbies and goals, personal goals, I would like to achieve, in which I do. And like I go to the restroom and take a huge dump, I deal with my bodily needs. In a capitalist society, you’re going to have fetish, you’re going to have perversion, because you have commodified the natural world. And like everything, people are always looking for the next thing, even though there’s nothing new under the sun. At the root of this, I think this has to do with internal issues that are from external environmental factors. They will never fix the issues, because the issues create the solutions, and those solutions give big tech the power they need to become the fascist techno dictatorship that they’ve always planned to be. Our children are being preyed upon by psychological masters, & weapons contractors.

                1. There’s also nothing inherently wrong with the idea of pornography, voyuerism, group play, sex toys, etc so long as all parties involved consent to the activity they’re engaging in. Humans like sex, they like masturbation, they like watching others perform it. Again, consent of all parties involved is the key factor. Truly understanding how to give and respect consent in what can be a high consequence interaction is why we set hard lines about age of consent and prohibit (or attempt to) minors from such activities, but also know that many are exploring and engaging in such behavior privately or with peers regardless. There’s a healthy, normal aspect to that because it’s human nature, and then there’s the dangerous side because porn of every sort lacks a lesson in consent, is often unrealistic/fantastical/deviant, and often treats the passive partner as an object for the pleasure of the active partner (typically women, but trans, “twink”, animals, and children are also depicted as such).

                My response: True

                1. This is the danger of porn to malleable minds who are responding to the biology of sex drive but do not yet have the confidence/skill/capacity to build healthy relationships where they can build intimacy and eventually engage in sex with a willing, consenting partner. Some end up forgoing the effort to find a partner entirely and meet their need with porn, which is a sad and unhealthy avenue. Other take the lessons of objectification and violate the boundaries of other. And the worst make their most deviant, dangerous, and hurtful fantasies reality. Some would behave like that without having been exposed to porn, but I would argue that porn is having a strong influence on the spread and normalization of truly deviant fetishes, like beast/child/gore/rape.

                My response: People need to raise their children and not shelter them.

                1. The commodification of sex is older than capitalism, it was being bartered and traded since… since forever. What capitalism has done is make a normal human behavior a profitable vice. Adults embracing their sexuality, recording it, selling it for other adults to view is not problematic so long as everyone who made it consented to the acts recorded and consents to the recording being put out for consumption by strangers. The internet has created a platform where it’s impossible to tell if those criteria were met before the material became permanently available and globally distributed, as well is a bastion of anonymity that can be accessed by anyone of any age. You can try and put up guardrails but humans are just going to figure out a workaround if they are inclined to do so. Pandora’s box has been opened, and even if there is no money to be made people are going to view, share, and trade porn. If you shut the internet down people would revert to whatever media forms were available to do the same. Even if you magically erased all porn, people, including adolescents, would still masturbate. What might diminish is the frequency and amount of time they spend doing so as well as the cultivation of deviant fetishes and objectifying partners.

                My respone:

                OMGAWD we are saying the same fucking thing. Instead of being punitive or restrictive, I mean, you gotta be restrictive to some degree. But I’m the type of person that believes additive solutions are the key to normal socialization of youths. You gotta give these little shits something better to do. This fucking country has no third spaces… if you live in the imperial core. It is a very boring place that’s hard to get around. I believe kids should have some structure, just like every organism on the planet, but it shouldn’t be dictated by values or interests that other people think you should be into. What I’m saying is, America is a very boring place, with very few options, and everything cost a fortune. It’s no wonder kids are on the internet constantly. It’s like we built the world of the computer and the car, and we forgot to add in some space for human living. America also has a problem with being over-competitive. In that process of being over-competitive, we become jealous, envious, and vengeful. From the top to the bottom, these toxic behaviors are pervasive. So, when it comes to revenge porn, I mean, I’m just not interested in celebrities, or even the girl next door, or the guy next door, I really just keep to myself when it comes to all that. I prefer a good album to a good song. And a lot of times my favorite bands I don’t even know the names of the musicians. When you watch movies, do you care about the story or the actor in it? I mean, even the way movies are made, they are made to be cut after cut, instead of joining film like they do in long scenes from the past. This has to do with attention span. So what I’m saying, it’s a cultural issue. I don’t think the accelerationism and the restrictive measures of the tech community are going to solve any of our depraved behaviors. Like I said, if these kids had something better to do, they wouldn’t be doing what they’re doing.

                1. The people trying to create a “solution” aren’t doing so because they see that some forms of porn production and consumption is problematic, they see human sexuality as problematic. They’re not trying to steer how porn is produced and consumed into a healthy manner, they treat sexuality outside of their concept of divine purpose as deviant. Plus it’s a “rules for thee not me” attitude, especially when the people pushing it support one of the world’s most infamous and abusive deviants. The human need for sexual stimulation/release is like the human need to eat and drink. Capitalism didn’t invent it, it just exploits necessity.

                My respone:

                Yeah some people just get off by being in charge and eatin mcdonalds. Boy oh boy you are verbose. “divine purpose as deviant” Also I see it not as divine nor deviant